Muslim underwear – Fashions to blow you out of the sky…
As one who takes to what have apparently become the Unfriendly Skies on a regular basis, I find this situation particularly disturbing.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091229/ap_on_re_us/us_airliner_attack
"WASHINGTON – Two federal agencies charged with keeping potential terrorists off airplanes and out of the country have been without their top leaders for nearly a year. It took the Obama administration more than eight months to nominate anyone to lead the Transportation Security Administration and the Customs and Border Protection agency.
The attempted Christmas Day terrorist attack on a Detroit-bound airliner has prompted a review of U.S. security policies. The acting heads of those agencies — both created in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks — will be at the forefront of these discussions.
Bogged down with health care reform, the Senate has yet to set a date to hold hearings for the Customs position. And Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has placed a hold on the president's choice to head the TSA over the senator's concern that the new leader would let TSA screeners join a labor union. This has some Democrats blaming politics for the vacancy."
Hmmm... I can't help but wonder... Will health care reform [which the majority of Americans OPPOSE] put me back together after I've been blown out of the sky by some Muslim's dirty underwear? Just imagine if this administration put the kind effort they're putting into unwanted health care "reform" [and I do use the term LOOSELY] into protecting us from radical Islam...
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/lying_to_ourselves_sjQTP9OuIQIrjE0oaYch2K
"Although willing -- at last -- to briefly use the word "terror," yesterday President Obama still refused to make a connection between the action, the date and Islam."
Last night I heard DHSer Michael Chertoff state that the the terror problem simply can't be solved... That basically, when we change, terrorism changes, therefore we will always be vulnerable... Ummm, WHAT??? So what he's saying is, under no uncertain terms, Janet Napolitano and company are incapable of keeping us safe... When did THIS kind of rhetoric become acceptable? It seems to me, in the REAL world [aka, the private sector], when one is contracted to execute a function, they either perform or get replaced... It's just plain common sense. Evidently, according to Chertoff at least, we're supporting an organization [The DHS] which serves little purpose. LOL, kinda like the rest of the government... I'm only laughing to keep from crying...
I have no qualms whatsoever about stating right here and now I CAN SOLVE THE PROBLEM. It's very simple really, as this situation is no different than any other... At the end of the day it boils down to the two camps you find on the opposing ends of EVERY socio-political "discussion"... Those who believe in personal accountability, and those who don't. Apparently, those who DON'T are currently in charge, and WE THE PEOPLE will continue to suffer the consequences...
Here is how I CAN FIX OUR PROBLEMS WITH HOMELAND SECURITY:
FIRST and foremost, FIRE Janet Napolitano. She's more concerned with the perceived "threat" she feels exists within people like myself as opposed to Muslims walking around with a load in their pants. SECOND, anyone on this DHS "Watch List", will instantaneously be upgraded to the "No Fly List". Clearly this "Watch List" is an exercise in futility as demonstrated by the singed pair of tighty-whities now on display by practically every news service in existence. THIRD, profiling [NOT to be confused with stereotyping] needs to be removed from the list of the "politically incorrect" [a term born out of Communist Russia's heyday] concepts. Profiling is actually a by-product of the practical application of cognitive reasoning. Leave it to the government to consider such things a "no-no". FOURTH, use some of the SCAMULUS money to hire competent TSA workers... You know... Maybe instead of having Shaniqua and Deronde' doing the screening, hire some ex-cops or anyone else with an actual legitimate security background. Last but not least, I would ENCOURAGE passengers to BEAT THE LIVIN SHIT OUT OF ANYONE who "steps out" during a flight. I mean it... Turn them into an unrecognizable bloody mess to be held up for all to see. This is the ONLY kind of statement radical Islam understands. Let them know that if they're going to try any of their bullshit on US aircraft, THEY WILL BE DENIED THEIR RENDEZVOUS WITH ALLAH AND THE 72 VIRGINS IN A PAINFUL FASHION. They need to be SHOWN that this is what happens to those who attempt Jihad on US citizens. Obviously Obama's declarations that we're a "Muslim Nation" http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/9959057/Barack_Hussein_Obama_US_one_of_the_largest_Muslim_countries_in_the_world/ and the myriad of other words of capitulation he's expressed all over the world have had no effect. Continuing on the same failed course of action and expecting a different outcome is the very definition of insanity. Of course, none of this is Obama's fault, it was a "systemic failure" which enabled Abdul-Muhammad Alu-Akbar Jihad to board not one, but two aircraft sporting his Al-Qaeda approved under garments...
Most Commented Posts
DRY RUN FOR TERROR
Security incident aboard AirTran Flight 297 suggests terror “Dry Run”
A group of thirteen men dressed in traditional Muslim attire were among 73 passengers who boarded AirTran Flight 297 on Tuesday, 17 November 2009, a routine flight scheduled to depart Atlanta Hartsfield Airport, gate C-16 at 4:43 PM ET to Houston Hobby Airport. Reports developed by this investigator found two witnesses who observed direct interaction among all of these Muslim men at the terminal.
As the passengers boarded the aircraft, two of the Muslim men took seats in first class, while the remaining eleven were seated throughout the remaining rows of the aircraft. Most had carrying-on bags that they stowed in the overhead compartments above their seats...
...the media does not want to cover [this story] and everyone from the airline to the TSA and other government agencies want to keep very quiet. The reasons, I have been told, is fear of predatory lawsuits, negative publicity from accusations of religious profiling, and the obligatory subjugation to mindless mandatory Muslim sensitivity training that make a mockery of our American system of values.
What can I really say about this? As far as I'm concerned, we're being set up... We're getting set up to suffer some kind of needless terror attack so it can be used as just another political pry bar used to uncrate someone's agenda... Let's face it people, if we can't even trust NASA and supposed scientists to present us with FACTUAL information, who CAN we turn to? Given the fact the White House can't even seem to keep "party crashers" from meeting the president face to face, what hope is there they'll actually be able to stop a terrorist attack?
Judging by the Fort Hood attack, the answer is painfully obvious.
Most Commented Posts
White House won’t provide witnesses for Fort Hood hearing – Obama the concealer
The first public congressional hearing on the Fort Hood attack will not include testimony from any current federal law enforcement,
military or intelligence officials because the Obama administration "declined to provide any" such witnesses, according to a Senate committee source.
This man is insane and needs to be removed from office.
Most Commented Posts
Hasan was a “Soldier of Allah” and it was right on his business card…
I could literally open my skull and peel back my brain when I hear about stuff like this... Nidal Malik Hasan, SoA [Soldier of Allah] right on his mother-lovin' business card, but no, we shouldn't rush to conclusions regarding this animal's shooting spree... I've seen some really ridiculous shit lately, we all have, but when terrorists start carry business cards which identify them as such... Come on, man!!! That seems ridiculous in and of itself, but then to go on and say this man was also a major in the US Armed Forces, was also a psychiatrist, who was supposed to be helping our veterans return to civilian life. I mean COME ON, MAN!!! If you were sitting in a movie theater watching this kind of a plot line unfold, you'd be sitting there saying, "This shit is ridiculous... A radical Muslim, with SoA right on his business card, serving as a military Dr. on a US military base in Texas... A PSYCHIATRIST no less..." I don't know about you, but I'd walk out on such a flick thinking just too fantastic to be believable. Yet, here we sit... Unable to walk out of this theater of horrors...
Related Posts
Nidal Malik Hasan’s “alleged” deathtoll is 14, one victim pregnant.
Pregnant Fort Hood victim Francheska Velez mourned in Humboldt Park
Nine weeks into her pregnancy, the Army private called her cousin in Chicago on Thursday to tell her about her early bouts of morning sickness and how excited she was about the child growing inside of her.
How can these "journalists" in the media formally known as mainstream, continue to report the death toll to be 13, when Francheska Velez was nine weeks pregnant? If that's not bad enough, idiots at ABC are focusing on how he got the gun, as if the GUN was the problem... One of the saddest parts of all this could very well be that in a room full of soldiers, Hasan himself was the only one who was armed. Perhaps if we were to allow soldiers to actually carry side arms, things like this couldn't happen... Sure, Hasan could have still capped off a few rounds, but the severity of his attack would have been considerably reduced had the guy next to him had the ability to expedite his journey into the after-life. In fact, the same would be true of society at large... In fact, since the government is so hell bent on issuing some sort of mandate directly affecting ALL citizens, it should be something like requiring arms and light weapons training for everyone. Imagine would it would be like, living in a society where every time a gang-banger pulled a gun, he had to do so at the risk of being greased by John Q. Public...
Digression into a discussion on guns is exactly what "they" want so allow me to refocus on the topic at hand... Nidal Malik Hasan, a radical Muslim, carried out Jihad on the Fort Hood military base in Texas, "allegedly" killing FOURTEEN PEOPLE, INCLUDING AN UNBORN CHILD. Everyone else, EVEN FOX NEWS, calls it thirteen with no mention of Velez's unborn baby... Then again, according to people like Cass Sunstein and Zeke Emanuel, that "child" isn't even actualized until a sufficient State investment has been made into shaping them into a productive drone. Until they've achieved the title "viable contributor", their continued existence is in question anyway...
Related Posts
They saw Hasan coming and did nothing-You want to put these people in charge of health care too???
Someone explain to me how the following can possibly be true:
Fort Hood Suspect Warned of Muslim Threat Within Military
Fort Hood suspect was under FBI probe in 2008
U.S. Knew of Suspect’s Tie to Radical Cleric
Officials: U.S. Army Told of Hasan's Contacts with Al Qaeda
Ladies and gentlemen, how is this not a case of gross, criminal negligence on the part of the people who were in possession of this information? If this administration cannot even keep our own fucking soldiers safe on a military base in TEXAS, for God's sake, what can they do? How much longer will we as a people suffer under the veil of political correctness which has been firmly pulled over our eyes? HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING FROM THE UK? Is this what's in our future?
Do you even care?
Related Posts
Homeland chief warns against anti-Muslim backlash, from The United Arab Emirates???
ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates — The U.S. Homeland Security secretary says she is working to prevent a
possible wave of anti-Muslim sentiment after the shootings at Fort Hood in Texas.
Janet Napolitano says her agency is working with groups across the United States to try to deflect any backlash against American Muslims following Thursday's rampage by Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, a Muslim who reportedly expressed growing dismay over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The shootings left 13 people dead and 29 wounded.
Napolitano was in the United Arab Emirates on Sunday for talks with security officials and a meeting with women university students in Abu Dhabi.
Call me crazy [people do all the time] but why is it the Chief of HOMELAND Security goes running off to the United Arab Emirates following a terrorist attack on U.S. Soil? I mean, isn't the problem HERE, at Fort Hood? Wouldn't it make sense for the Chief of HOMELAND Security to start by addressing the problem AT HOME? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON IN THIS COUNTRY ANYWAY???
In the meantime, Anwar al Awlaki describes Major Hasan’s atrocity as ‘the right thing to do’....
WAKE UP AMERICA






