Muslim underwear – Fashions to blow you out of the sky…
As one who takes to what have apparently become the Unfriendly Skies on a regular basis, I find this situation particularly disturbing.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091229/ap_on_re_us/us_airliner_attack
"WASHINGTON – Two federal agencies charged with keeping potential terrorists off airplanes and out of the country have been without their top leaders for nearly a year. It took the Obama administration more than eight months to nominate anyone to lead the Transportation Security Administration and the Customs and Border Protection agency.
The attempted Christmas Day terrorist attack on a Detroit-bound airliner has prompted a review of U.S. security policies. The acting heads of those agencies — both created in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks — will be at the forefront of these discussions.
Bogged down with health care reform, the Senate has yet to set a date to hold hearings for the Customs position. And Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has placed a hold on the president's choice to head the TSA over the senator's concern that the new leader would let TSA screeners join a labor union. This has some Democrats blaming politics for the vacancy."
Hmmm... I can't help but wonder... Will health care reform [which the majority of Americans OPPOSE] put me back together after I've been blown out of the sky by some Muslim's dirty underwear? Just imagine if this administration put the kind effort they're putting into unwanted health care "reform" [and I do use the term LOOSELY] into protecting us from radical Islam...
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/lying_to_ourselves_sjQTP9OuIQIrjE0oaYch2K
"Although willing -- at last -- to briefly use the word "terror," yesterday President Obama still refused to make a connection between the action, the date and Islam."
Last night I heard DHSer Michael Chertoff state that the the terror problem simply can't be solved... That basically, when we change, terrorism changes, therefore we will always be vulnerable... Ummm, WHAT??? So what he's saying is, under no uncertain terms, Janet Napolitano and company are incapable of keeping us safe... When did THIS kind of rhetoric become acceptable? It seems to me, in the REAL world [aka, the private sector], when one is contracted to execute a function, they either perform or get replaced... It's just plain common sense. Evidently, according to Chertoff at least, we're supporting an organization [The DHS] which serves little purpose. LOL, kinda like the rest of the government... I'm only laughing to keep from crying...
I have no qualms whatsoever about stating right here and now I CAN SOLVE THE PROBLEM. It's very simple really, as this situation is no different than any other... At the end of the day it boils down to the two camps you find on the opposing ends of EVERY socio-political "discussion"... Those who believe in personal accountability, and those who don't. Apparently, those who DON'T are currently in charge, and WE THE PEOPLE will continue to suffer the consequences...
Here is how I CAN FIX OUR PROBLEMS WITH HOMELAND SECURITY:
FIRST and foremost, FIRE Janet Napolitano. She's more concerned with the perceived "threat" she feels exists within people like myself as opposed to Muslims walking around with a load in their pants. SECOND, anyone on this DHS "Watch List", will instantaneously be upgraded to the "No Fly List". Clearly this "Watch List" is an exercise in futility as demonstrated by the singed pair of tighty-whities now on display by practically every news service in existence. THIRD, profiling [NOT to be confused with stereotyping] needs to be removed from the list of the "politically incorrect" [a term born out of Communist Russia's heyday] concepts. Profiling is actually a by-product of the practical application of cognitive reasoning. Leave it to the government to consider such things a "no-no". FOURTH, use some of the SCAMULUS money to hire competent TSA workers... You know... Maybe instead of having Shaniqua and Deronde' doing the screening, hire some ex-cops or anyone else with an actual legitimate security background. Last but not least, I would ENCOURAGE passengers to BEAT THE LIVIN SHIT OUT OF ANYONE who "steps out" during a flight. I mean it... Turn them into an unrecognizable bloody mess to be held up for all to see. This is the ONLY kind of statement radical Islam understands. Let them know that if they're going to try any of their bullshit on US aircraft, THEY WILL BE DENIED THEIR RENDEZVOUS WITH ALLAH AND THE 72 VIRGINS IN A PAINFUL FASHION. They need to be SHOWN that this is what happens to those who attempt Jihad on US citizens. Obviously Obama's declarations that we're a "Muslim Nation" http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/9959057/Barack_Hussein_Obama_US_one_of_the_largest_Muslim_countries_in_the_world/ and the myriad of other words of capitulation he's expressed all over the world have had no effect. Continuing on the same failed course of action and expecting a different outcome is the very definition of insanity. Of course, none of this is Obama's fault, it was a "systemic failure" which enabled Abdul-Muhammad Alu-Akbar Jihad to board not one, but two aircraft sporting his Al-Qaeda approved under garments...
Most Commented Posts
G20 Meet To Finalize Dumping Of Dollar?
I'm not normally a big Alex Jones guy, but I recieved this via e-mail and it certainly is disturbing...
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Wednesday, Nov 4, 2009
Researcher and author Daniel Estulin, best known for his exposé of the ultra secretive Bilderberg Group, says inside sources have informed him that the core focus of the G20 meeting this weekend will be to discuss ditching the Dollar and implementing a global centralized monetary system.
A press release detailing Estulin's statements says that G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, meeting in St. Andrews, Scotland, will debate actions to sink the U.S. Dollar, thereby crashing the present world financial system.
The instability and chaos resulting out of such a breakdown would act as a pretext to launch a consolidating new economic world order.
"Estulin says that the success or failure of this callous plan hinges on the ability of the US and UK representatives to convince the Russian, the Chinese and other national governments to go along with their scheme." The release states.
Estulin first reported on this agenda at this year's Bilderberg conference held in Greece back in May. According to the author, the elite group has termed the move “demand destruction”.
The Bilderberg Group meeting is an annual confab of around 150 of the world’s most influential powerbrokers in government, industry, banking, media, academia and the military-industrial complex. The secretive group operates under “Chatham House rules,” meaning that no details of what is discussed can ever be leaked to the media, despite editors of the world’s biggest newspapers, the Washington Post, the New York Times and the Financial Times, being present at the meeting.
Insiders at the meeting told Estulin that Bilderberg was divided on whether to put into motion, “Either a prolonged, agonizing depression that dooms the world to decades of stagnation, decline and poverty … or an intense-but-shorter depression that paves the way for a new sustainable economic world order, with less sovereignty but more efficiency.”
According to the researcher, some Bilderberg insiders fear that the fallout from the chaos of a major crash could ultimately result in a loss of control over the world.
Estulin believes this weekend's G20 meeting, being held on the site of the 1998 Bilderberg conference, will be used to finalize this deliberation.
Most Commented Posts
Lawmakers ask Library of Congress to retract Honduras report – John Kerry, hater of freedom
WASHINGTON -- The chairmen of the House and Senate foreign relations committees are asking the Law Library of Congress to retract a
report on the military-backed coup in Honduras that they charge is flawed and "has contributed to the political crisis that still wracks'' the country.
The request, by Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. and Rep. Howard Berman, D-Calif., has sparked cries of censorship from Republicans who say the Democrats don't like what the August report said: that the government of Honduras had the authority to remove President Manuel Zelaya from office.
Kerry is another freakin' menace that has to be shown the door at the very next possible opportunity. At least Herman Munster was funny...
Most Commented Posts
Anti-BNP Protesters Breach BBC Security – What’s wrong with this picture? #2
UPDATE
BNP on Question Time: Nick Griffin uses BBC appearance to attack Muslims and gays
The BBC came under siege as Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP, used his appearance on Question Time to attack Muslims and homosexuals while defending the Ku Klux Klan. [whole story]
I can't help but be disturbed by the distinct lack of supporting information with regard to the opening headlines of this article... I would expect a credible journalist to follow such allegations with direct quotes, yet none are provided. In fact, the headlines are never addressed at all ANYWHERE in the article... Doesn't anyone else find this strange? Given the previously mentioned ban on talk show host Michael Savage, AND the recent last minute cancellation of a free-speech debate between Savage and Cambridge Union, one can only wonder what was really said, and how much of that headline is editorializing...
If Griffin is "attacking" Muslims in Britain, I would have to say any attack would actually be an act of self defense in this particular case. They have Sharia Law in some communities and an openly defiant Muslim population who openly call for the end of English rule in The UK... If he is attacking gays and expressing any kind of support for The KKK, well than, I'd have to say he's lost me there... We'll follow this a bit and see if we get any actual quotes from Griffin so we can better understand what took place.
Developing...
Related Posts
Anti-BNP Protesters Breach BBC Security – What’s wrong with this picture?
This image is a screen grab from a video found on Sky News in an article covering an "anti-fascism" rally in the UK, directed at The British National Party (BNP). Their leader, Nick Griffin is to appear on The BBC's Question Time, which from a standpoint of political prestige, is the Brit equivalent to The O'Reilly Factor. I'm no authority on politics in The UK, but a couple of things struck me right off the top in this story which piqued my interest... It seemed to me much of what The BNP is going through, so too are Tea Party-ers, "Birthers", "Truthers", or just about anyone one who wants to go up against the Obama administration.
First off, the most striking thing about that image is the ubiquitous presence of mass-produced signs... We as "Tea Baggers" understand first hand what true grassroots movements are, because we all make our own signs. It's rare to attend one of our events and find two people carrying two of the same. We roll our own, thanks... Commercially produced signs means somebody spent money, which means there's some other organization "supporting" the protest. This isn't grassroots opposition, it's organized, and therefore suspect [in my book].
The second thing that struck me about this story was how the opposition handles The BNP... The BNP is big in controlling immigration, and apparently has a "white only" policy within their party, which, rumor has it will be dropped prior to this appearance on Question Time. Naturally, any and all opponents to The BNP have until know been content to simply scream "racist!" at them, thus ending the discussion. I know the very words "white only" makes most Conservatives uncomfortable, but you have to take it in context of what's happening with the explosion of the Muslim population in the UK. Radicals who openly demonstrate and publicly call for the deaths of people like Geert Wilders. You also have to be able to overcome your own indoctrination. You know, that whole thing that only white male Christians are racists, everyone else is merely struggling for "equality"... Sure... Everyone gets to struggle for equality, or some other socio-cultural recognition but "us"... If we as Caucasians, the vast minority on the planet, attempt to speak up for preservation of our culture boy... Watch out, you might as well paint a swastika on your head.
The BNP is the upstart, the newcomer... The third party emerging because the other two who are
typically in power have screwed the pooch... Sound familiar? Again, I would like to reiterate that I'm no authority on UK politics, but there certainly seems to be some parallels with what's going on here in our own country. Racist seems to be one of the key designations du jour for ANYONE who wants to challenge the status quo.
The last thing that struck me in this article was one of the comments offered by a Question Time audience member:
Frank Langan, 66, from Ealing, west London, was escorted into the building as he was one of the audience members.
Before he went into Television Centre, he said: "I'm going to go in and find out what Nick Griffin has got to say. I don't have to agree with it but I think it's right that he is allowed on Question Time.
"I think everybody is entitled to their own opinion, even if you don't like them."
Really? Maybe somebody ought to tell the pharmacist, Gordon Brown... Last I heard, Michael Savage was still Banned From Britain...

