Muslim underwear – Fashions to blow you out of the sky…
As one who takes to what have apparently become the Unfriendly Skies on a regular basis, I find this situation particularly disturbing.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091229/ap_on_re_us/us_airliner_attack
"WASHINGTON – Two federal agencies charged with keeping potential terrorists off airplanes and out of the country have been without their top leaders for nearly a year. It took the Obama administration more than eight months to nominate anyone to lead the Transportation Security Administration and the Customs and Border Protection agency.
The attempted Christmas Day terrorist attack on a Detroit-bound airliner has prompted a review of U.S. security policies. The acting heads of those agencies — both created in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks — will be at the forefront of these discussions.
Bogged down with health care reform, the Senate has yet to set a date to hold hearings for the Customs position. And Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has placed a hold on the president's choice to head the TSA over the senator's concern that the new leader would let TSA screeners join a labor union. This has some Democrats blaming politics for the vacancy."
Hmmm... I can't help but wonder... Will health care reform [which the majority of Americans OPPOSE] put me back together after I've been blown out of the sky by some Muslim's dirty underwear? Just imagine if this administration put the kind effort they're putting into unwanted health care "reform" [and I do use the term LOOSELY] into protecting us from radical Islam...
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/lying_to_ourselves_sjQTP9OuIQIrjE0oaYch2K
"Although willing -- at last -- to briefly use the word "terror," yesterday President Obama still refused to make a connection between the action, the date and Islam."
Last night I heard DHSer Michael Chertoff state that the the terror problem simply can't be solved... That basically, when we change, terrorism changes, therefore we will always be vulnerable... Ummm, WHAT??? So what he's saying is, under no uncertain terms, Janet Napolitano and company are incapable of keeping us safe... When did THIS kind of rhetoric become acceptable? It seems to me, in the REAL world [aka, the private sector], when one is contracted to execute a function, they either perform or get replaced... It's just plain common sense. Evidently, according to Chertoff at least, we're supporting an organization [The DHS] which serves little purpose. LOL, kinda like the rest of the government... I'm only laughing to keep from crying...
I have no qualms whatsoever about stating right here and now I CAN SOLVE THE PROBLEM. It's very simple really, as this situation is no different than any other... At the end of the day it boils down to the two camps you find on the opposing ends of EVERY socio-political "discussion"... Those who believe in personal accountability, and those who don't. Apparently, those who DON'T are currently in charge, and WE THE PEOPLE will continue to suffer the consequences...
Here is how I CAN FIX OUR PROBLEMS WITH HOMELAND SECURITY:
FIRST and foremost, FIRE Janet Napolitano. She's more concerned with the perceived "threat" she feels exists within people like myself as opposed to Muslims walking around with a load in their pants. SECOND, anyone on this DHS "Watch List", will instantaneously be upgraded to the "No Fly List". Clearly this "Watch List" is an exercise in futility as demonstrated by the singed pair of tighty-whities now on display by practically every news service in existence. THIRD, profiling [NOT to be confused with stereotyping] needs to be removed from the list of the "politically incorrect" [a term born out of Communist Russia's heyday] concepts. Profiling is actually a by-product of the practical application of cognitive reasoning. Leave it to the government to consider such things a "no-no". FOURTH, use some of the SCAMULUS money to hire competent TSA workers... You know... Maybe instead of having Shaniqua and Deronde' doing the screening, hire some ex-cops or anyone else with an actual legitimate security background. Last but not least, I would ENCOURAGE passengers to BEAT THE LIVIN SHIT OUT OF ANYONE who "steps out" during a flight. I mean it... Turn them into an unrecognizable bloody mess to be held up for all to see. This is the ONLY kind of statement radical Islam understands. Let them know that if they're going to try any of their bullshit on US aircraft, THEY WILL BE DENIED THEIR RENDEZVOUS WITH ALLAH AND THE 72 VIRGINS IN A PAINFUL FASHION. They need to be SHOWN that this is what happens to those who attempt Jihad on US citizens. Obviously Obama's declarations that we're a "Muslim Nation" http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/9959057/Barack_Hussein_Obama_US_one_of_the_largest_Muslim_countries_in_the_world/ and the myriad of other words of capitulation he's expressed all over the world have had no effect. Continuing on the same failed course of action and expecting a different outcome is the very definition of insanity. Of course, none of this is Obama's fault, it was a "systemic failure" which enabled Abdul-Muhammad Alu-Akbar Jihad to board not one, but two aircraft sporting his Al-Qaeda approved under garments...
Most Commented Posts
Liberals don’t care about the facts… Molotov Mitchell
This is good stuff
Most Commented Posts
Global warming???
While I certainly recognize weather and climate are certainly two different things, it certainly seems ironic that people are rioting in
Copenhagen for fear of global warming in light of the following...
http://www.dmi.dk/eng/index/forecasts/forecast_for_copenhagen.htm
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Calgary+cold+snap+breaks+century+record/2341950/story.html
http://cbs5.com/local/cold.weather.temperatures.2.1359906.html
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/12/cold_snap_continues_with_anoth.html
Brrr... All this global warming is giving me the chills
Related Posts
I Pledge Allegiance to Global Warming…
British scientists sign a government loyalty oath.
One scientist told The Times he felt under pressure to sign. "The Met Office is a major employer of scientists and has long had a
policy of only appointing and working with those who subscribe to their views on man-made global warming," he said.
We are potentially entering what could turn into a modern "Dark Age"... One darker than I would have ever imagined could take place in my own lifetime. We're facing a situation where men of science, thought to be the last bastion of truth to many, are now being placed in a position where if they want to remain employed in their chosen field, they are going to have to consider policy over empirical data when it comes to reporting their "findings". Chilling...
I don't know about anyone else, but the thought of the government taking over science is just the kind of thing that could destroy our civilization. This insane, corrupt rabble that has infiltrated our legislative body has in essence bankrupted both morally, as well as financially, the greatest society the world has ever known in just the last 50 years... Allowing these people to hijack the scientific process is a deadly proposition... Even in the face of the recent Climategate, voices are calling for population controls such as enforcing a Chinese-inspired one child per family policy... All to "save the planet"... Hmmm... I wonder... How motivated is the scientific community going to be to produce life prolonging drugs when they're being run by a government who doesn't want people to live?
Perhaps one of the most alarming regarding one child per family policy, is, what are the odds the Nation of Islam is going to agree to such a control? This is a pretty alarming video with a TON of hits on YouTube... I don't know who's responsible for the data, but from a cultural standpoint, it doesn't seem too unbelievable...
Related Posts
More of Green Al’s Gasses – Climategate Poet Al Gore
Omaha, Nebraska: December 31, 2010 The Reformed Senate Select Committee to Investigate the Mass Progressive Suicides (CIMPS) of December 2009 today released its findings on the tragedy.
CIMPS’ summary concludes:
Late last year a virulent poem created by Al Gore decimated the Progressive Movement of the United States when 98% of its membership committed suicide after reading it. Contrary to rumors of a putsch by the Conservative Revolutionary Front, it is the finding of the emergency U.S. government in Omaha that it was not LSD in the water supply of Washington, the Upper West Side, and vast portions of Hollywood, San Francisco, and 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue that precipitated the near extinction of American progressives. Neither was it a conspiracy of global oil interests headed by defrocked members of the KGB. The deaths are attributable to the deranged act of a lone poet.
This man is insane... Only someone suffering from a complete and utter detachment from reality could possibly write such a "poem" in the face of Climategate. What's interesting is, he's probably no less sane than the rest of the zealots and their quest for Green Jesus... I mean, take a look at what's happening in Copenhagen already: Riot in Copenhagen, heat on squabbling leaders
"By evening, the frustration had turned to anger as a crowd of anywhere between 50,000 to 100,000 mainly young people shut down central Copenhagen and young men in black hoods smashed shop windows. Riot police moved in swiftly and arrested at least 300 people."
Funny, you never seem to hear about violence at Tea Party protests... That is, unless of course the local SEIU happens to be in attendance: (Videos) SEIU Thugs Attack Actual Grassroots Citizens (And Obama doesn't want to hear from the grass roots)
Maybe somebody oughta ask Nancy Pelosi about some of this stuff... She was trying to wring some water out of that dead skin mask of hers, feigning tears while expressing concern over potential violence from... Well, anybody ready this column...
Only in Bizarro World, folks...
Related Posts
Blame Bush Theory still alive and well on CL politics
The following is a post [mine] from the Craigslist Political Community Forum. It was the last in a thread where I asked a simple question and never received an answer. Figured maybe I'd try again here
http://sandiego.craigslist.org/csd/pol/1504320573.html
Your insistence on only "discussing" Obama from a Bush frame of reference only confirms my earlier observation about you and your ilk. There is no exit strategy, there is no plan "B", no matter how fraudulent your ideology becomes under the weight of exposition, no matter what information is introduced into the equation, you simply cannot deviate from your programming... You all have all the answers [the debate is over], yet somehow at the same time you're not accountable for anything... It's always SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT WHEN THINGS DON'T PAN OUT.
I guess it's just a difference in how people are raised... You see, part of my motivation on this board is actually a form of penance for having been apathetic towards politics for so long. I'M partially responsible for this bullshit mess we have right now, which is why I must now take action against it by countering ideology with reality where ever I find it. I am here, and I am accountable TODAY...
Obama campaigned hard to become Captain of A SHIP THAT ALREADY HIT THE ICEBERG... Now he's here, it's a year later and the hull is sinking deeper into the waterline... When I ask, "Why is this?", it hardly seems acceptable to settle for, "Well, that last Captain, he hit that ice pretty hard ya know..." YEAH, WE FUCKING GET IT, AND APPARENTLY PEOPLE THOUGHT YOU DID TOO. THAT'S HOW YOU GOT THE JOB, REMEMBER?
In the simplest terms, I wonder is there anyone who will identify, in an actual unit of time measurement, how long must Obama be in office before it is politically correct in your opinion [to put it into terms perhaps you can relate to] to call into question his actions as president?
If you can answer the question, do it. If you can't, have a nice day anyway
![]()
Obama apologists on CL outright REFUSE to accept any wrong doing on his part under any circumstances, nor will they give direct answers to direct questions. Maybe someone around here wants to take a stab at it?
Most Commented Posts
One of our own getting some press!!! World, me Roger Ogden…
A Battle Within the Tea Party Movement? Roger Ogden Responds
Roger Ogden, the Meetup Organizer of the San Diego Tea Party, has accepted my offer to respond to my entry from last night, "A Battle Within? Emerging Divisions in the Tea Party Movement." Roger submitted the following essay, unedited, along with the videos:
I know Roger and he is a wealth of information on the shocking reality of Black Liberation Theology... It seems incredible to me more people don't get alarmed at the kinds of things which were preached in Obama's church of 20 years... Part of me believes that a lot of people simply cannot accept this information because it would mean they voted into power what is essentially, a sick man. Nobody wants that on their conscience...
BLT needs to be considered as part of the whole which makes up the sum of a man we really know painfully little about. Apparently due to some difficulty with transparency or something...
Related Posts
Webb warns Obama on taking action in Copenhagen
Dear Mr. President:
I would like to express my concern regarding reports that the Administration may believe it has the unilateral power to commit the government of the United States to certain standards that may be agreed upon at the upcoming United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of Parties 15 in Copenhagen, Denmark. The phrase “politically binding” has been used.
Although details have not been made available, recent statements by Special Envoy on Climate Change Todd Stern indicate that negotiators may be intending to commit the United States to a nationwide emission reduction program. As you well know from your time in the Senate, only specific legislation agreed upon in the Congress, or a treaty ratified by the Senate, could actually create such a commitment on behalf of our country.
I would very much appreciate having this matter clarified in advance of the Copenhagen meetings.
Sincerely,
Jim Webb
United States Senator
Most Commented Posts
DRY RUN FOR TERROR
Security incident aboard AirTran Flight 297 suggests terror “Dry Run”
A group of thirteen men dressed in traditional Muslim attire were among 73 passengers who boarded AirTran Flight 297 on Tuesday, 17 November 2009, a routine flight scheduled to depart Atlanta Hartsfield Airport, gate C-16 at 4:43 PM ET to Houston Hobby Airport. Reports developed by this investigator found two witnesses who observed direct interaction among all of these Muslim men at the terminal.
As the passengers boarded the aircraft, two of the Muslim men took seats in first class, while the remaining eleven were seated throughout the remaining rows of the aircraft. Most had carrying-on bags that they stowed in the overhead compartments above their seats...
...the media does not want to cover [this story] and everyone from the airline to the TSA and other government agencies want to keep very quiet. The reasons, I have been told, is fear of predatory lawsuits, negative publicity from accusations of religious profiling, and the obligatory subjugation to mindless mandatory Muslim sensitivity training that make a mockery of our American system of values.
What can I really say about this? As far as I'm concerned, we're being set up... We're getting set up to suffer some kind of needless terror attack so it can be used as just another political pry bar used to uncrate someone's agenda... Let's face it people, if we can't even trust NASA and supposed scientists to present us with FACTUAL information, who CAN we turn to? Given the fact the White House can't even seem to keep "party crashers" from meeting the president face to face, what hope is there they'll actually be able to stop a terrorist attack?
Judging by the Fort Hood attack, the answer is painfully obvious.



